Raptor™

DOCKET EVALUATION & CASE SCORING AT SCALE​

FOR PLAINTIFF FIRMS, FUNDERS & PORTFOLIO OWNERS​

When a docket runs to thousands of files, Raptor™ evaluates every one against a

consistent standard, scores it, and returns the next actionable step — so firms and their

capital partners always know what they are holding.​



A docket you cannot score is a docket you cannot value, triage, or defend. Until now.​


Firms and their capital partners hold hundreds of thousands of case files that have been evaluated inconsistently, if at all. Positions get underwritten on case counts and marked on assumptions.


Raptor™ replaces the count with a score.​


What Raptor™ Delivers​

Raptor™ evaluates every case on the docket against one consistent standard, scores it, and recommends the next actionable step — then reports the whole portfolio on a fixed cadence.​

Case Evaluation

Every file reviewed against a

consistent evaluation standard —

the same yardstick applied to the

first file and the ten-thousandth.​

Case Scoring

Objective scoring shows exactly where each case stands today, turning an undifferentiated docket into a ranked inventory.​

Recommendations

Concrete next steps for work-up, prioritized by case difficulty, so effort goes where it changes the outcome.​

Portfolio Reporting

Monthly and quarterly reporting on the status of every case, in a form you can hand to a client, co-counsel, or an investment committee.​

  1. Schedule
  2. Verify ID
  3. Interact
  4. Quality Check
  5. Report
  6. Insights


Every step is documented — producing an audit trail from the first appointment through the final report.​

How Raptor™ Works​

1 - Evaluate

2 - Score

3 - Recommend

4 - Report

5 - Share

Every file goes through the same proprietary process — which is exactly why the scores can be compared across a docket, across campaigns, and across time.​

Built on Five Pillars​

1.

One Consistent Standard​

A single published evaluation rubric, applied by trained reviewers — not each paralegal’s judgment.​

2.

Objective Scoring

Scores derive from documented criteria, so two reviewers reach the same answer on the same file.​

3.

Actionable Next Steps

Every score carries a recommendation, so evaluation produces work rather than a report nobody acts on.​

4.

Portfolio-Level Visibility

Score distribution and migration across the whole docket, not case-by-case anecdote.​

5.

Audit-Ready Record

The basis for each score is documented and reproducible — defensible to a client, a court, or a lender.​

Built for the Docket and the Balance Sheet​

For Plaintiff Firms​

  • Know which files to work up first and which to stop spending on.​
  • Answer co-counsel and referring firms with data instead of impressions.​
  • Enter settlement negotiations with a documented view of your own inventory.


For Capital Partners​

  • Get a complete picture of the collateral before making financing decisions​
  • A defensible basis for interim marks and investor reporting.​
  • Early warning when score distribution moves the wrong way.​

Raptor™ turns a case count into a graded, defensible inventory

It's the difference between a position you hope about and a position you can price.​

CONTACT US TODAY

Let's get started on creating your system today so you can have more data for your cases tomorrow.